dateSat, Feb 26, 2005 at 11:45 PM

A question on the proof of the adaptive of phobias. How does
behaviorist prove that phobia is adaptive in term of evolution? Not
that I disagree with his conclusion, but his proof is questionable in
terms of validity. He ask a bunch of ‘expert’ to evaluate the
‘adaptivity’ of various phobia object, then of course, the majority of
feared object is rated dangerous. How could modern people determine
what is to be feared by ancient people, as our lifestyle is radically
different? What methodologists would support the idea that we can
change the attribute of an event by simply rating it? I wonder how the
ancient people rate our unhealthy lifestyle? So the conclusion forced
upon me is: This is pseudo-science.



在下方填入你的資料或按右方圖示以社群網站登入: 標誌

您的留言將使用 帳號。 登出 /  變更 )

Google+ photo

您的留言將使用 Google+ 帳號。 登出 /  變更 )

Twitter picture

您的留言將使用 Twitter 帳號。 登出 /  變更 )


您的留言將使用 Facebook 帳號。 登出 /  變更 )


連結到 %s

%d 位部落客按了讚: