A strange experiment on falling magnet

Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 6:27 PM

illl070820

A thought experiment using Parallel Path Technology.

Double Oscillation in Electromagnetic Field?

mdosdiscussion

Discussion on Magical Transformer

Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 2:14 PM

Last question on energy project

This discussion refer to the lecture I post here.

What happen if we applying Lawrence’s theory at the atomic level, i.e. what if we can accelerate the electron at the same way we swing the pendulum? The reverse question would be, what if we can decelerate electron by taking its energy to swing ‘pendulum’ at the atomic level? Could we stop the electron from rotating around the protons?

The logicality of conquering the world

Martin Luther King has a dream, it is yet to be fulfilled. With a dream you can’t guarantee the fulfillment of it. Without a dream, what can you fulfill? I am sure new energy project still sound crazy to many. That is why they are not the one who invent it. If new energy project sound crazy to you, then other things other inventor created must be extremely crazy. We live in a finite world indeed.
(I don’t why you can yourself a self-less business person. How can you do business without yourself?)
1. Would the oil and fossil fuel be used up?
2. Will there be sufficient alternative when 1 become yes?
3. Will the academic ever research the idea from free energy community?
4. What happen when the answer of 2 and 3 is no?
The luck and fortunate this New energy Project project hang on the answer of 2. Currently, my bet is all the political leader on Earth don’t have a determination to face the reality of 2. For those who have the courage, they don’t have sufficient resource to do anything useful. I also bet that 3 is no, we want them to be as stubborn as possible.
As a Big Writer(tm) , I wish my article is more understandable. Otherwise I would get an Ng. Nobel Prize for the most encrypted article of Physics instead. We should nominate Lawrence for Ng. Nobel Prize for Peace. Or we can place him in the list of 911 scammer.

A hypothesis on the Overunity Electromagnetic experiment

This discussion refer to the experiment proposed and done here. That maybe a pretty stupid idea to explain the source of extra electromagnetic energy. My thought is actually pretty simple: Suppose we display the oscillation with an oscillator, then we adjust the time-base to a greater number. The wave-like display is distorted in such a way which amplitude has increase while period is reduced when compare to original.
So my hypothesis is that the presence of strong magnetic field has distort the flow of time in the transformer, resulted an accelerated flow of time in the electrical current inside the transformer coil. Thus, relative to these who are outside the strong magnetic field, the electrical current has been amplified. The extra energy is coming from the difference of amplitude in oscillation due to the compression of time by the magnetic field by the magnet. In other words, we are using time as energy.

Possible explanation for energy from gravity?

Mon, Apr 4, 2005 at 3:04 AM

(The discussion below Refer to the energy project I involved, search for ‘All about the energy project’ in this blog.)

One critical problem I have forgot all along is the timing of electrical, magnetic and gravity force. Does it require time for a mass to react to another object’s gravity field? If I remember accurately, it require some time for E-M field to reach an object react to E-M field. If we could found out what time it take for such an reaction to happen, we could win a second Nobel prize.
In here, I would assume here gravity does NOT take any time to ‘travel’ from an object to another object. My hypothesis is that when kinetic energy is transfer to become electrical energy, there is a momentarily slow down of the swing. However, at the same time, the tension in the metal react to this slowing down and provide upward force require to counter gravity. And as kinetic energy is transfer to electrical energy at the same time, the tension(or construction energy) is drawn once again to support the momentum of moving upward. Then it reach the maximum it is possible to attain. This should be the place where potential energy is equal to kinetic energy plus the construction energy we exert through the circular motion.
As it begin to swing downward, the gravity is acting against the tension to push the swing downward. However, with the addition of tension resulted in a clockwise circular motion toward the point of equilibrium. Now gravity is accelerating the swing, which cutting through the magnetic lines. In that process, the kinetic energy is transfer to electrical energy. Then there should a momentarily slowing decrease of acceleration of the swing. However, as soon as the gravity ‘discover’ that swing is not accelerate(instantly) proportional to its mass(or some atoms in the swing felt that gravity is temporarily losing contact with it), a process is initialized to ‘fill-in-the-gap’ of that lose acceleration. Actually, it maybe the tension(incompressibility) of the metal first ‘detect’ this lost of gravity, therefore it react by pushing the swing outward. Therefore, I suppose that there maybe a continuously fluctuation of the acceleration and the speed of the swing that is detectable by VERY SENSITIVE equipment (provide that the equipment itself does NOT distort the parameter it want to measure). This delicate balance of gain and loss take place until the swing has reach its equilibrium point, which the accumulate enough energy to miss it. The same thing repeat itself on the other side.
Now I have two hypothesis:
1. Either the atom in the metal swing or Earth’s atom ‘detect’ and REACT to the reduction of gravity due to ‘lose’;
2. The Tension of the metal first react to the lose of gravity, and since it can’t be compress, it react by providing an impulse to push the swing object outward and downward;
3. Some complex interaction between Tension and Gravity.

Keep going this way, we are digging into the quantum reality of gravity. My general direction is by taking the microscopic picture of what really happen at each moment of the metal and swing. However, all is hypothesis without an experiment to test it, which is the first experiment I will do after the company laboratory is created. Seriously, if any of us could found an accurate description of this phenomena that is proven by experiment, the Nobel Prize of Physics within our reach. I guess you wouldn’t mind sharing a part of it to help patent my invention

Conservation of energy in swinging of pendulum?

Sat, May 14, 2005 at 3:03 PM

This is yet another discovery I made in the process of making a
G.E.G. All copyright reserved by me.
We all learn from the physics textbook that energy is conserved in
any situation. An excellent example would be a falling object: At any
moment of its descending, the sum total of its kinetic energy and
potential energy should be equal. This does not bother my intellect at
all. What I found interesting is the energy exchange of the case of
swinging or rotational motion. Does they obtain the same law of
conservation of energy as the case of falling object?
The reason I think why falling object is chosen for textbook
example is because of the linearity of the motion. During the whole
trajectory, the velocity remain on the same straight line as the
acceleration as well as the line which we calculate the level of
potential energy. Now consider the case of swinging object. As we
apply a pulse force to distrub the equilibrium, what the object
respond is by displacement in two dimension. Due to the restraint of a
rope, the object must SWING instead of moving in a plane parallel to
the ground. It is easy to see that as the object is swinging, it should
have its own set of angular momentum, angular velocity and rotational
energy. Although the conventional calculation require us to calculate
the velocity at different height, in what sense does these velocity
meant? Since the object is moving in a circular trajectory, it follows
that the object is changing its direction of movement in every
moment(with centipendal acceleration). So if that velocity have any
meaning, it should refer to the instantaneous velocity in the direction
of its movement. However, as far as I understand the teaching of
Physics, it doesn’t appear that velocity refer to the velocity at the
direction of its movement. It is most situably refer to the direction
of the vertical component of the movement since it is linear.(How
meaningful/useful is this calculation is another matter.) Moreover,
any conservation of energy formula would require a condition that NO
external force is acting on the system. This condition is VIOLATED
since a varying tension of the rope is CONTINUOUSLY acting on the
system to neutralize/reduce or even overcome the gravity. It would be
a better analogy to consider this system as an object is continuously
acting by a fixed and a variable force in the opposition direction.
Now, taken these considerations into account. The following
conclusion is of a closer description of reality: At any moment, the
sum of Rotational Kinetic Energy, Work done by the centripetal force
and gravitational Potential energy should be a constant. We can apply
this formula into calculate the exact Angular Velocity of the object,
then use sine and cosine of its value to obtain the vertical and
horizontal velocity of this object.

Energy from atomspheric pressure

Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 1:32 PM

This is yet another thought experiment for me to demonstrate the
inherited problem of the law of conservation of energy.
Suppose we have a reversed bottle on top of liquid surface that is
connected to a vacuum pump. The liquid surface area is assume to be
infinite, and it is exposed to atmospheric pressure except the area
covered by the bottle. As we pump out the air of the bottle, the
atmospheric pressure would rush the water into the bottle. Then we
open air on the top of bottle(which require no energy for this
process). Presumably the air would rush it, and the liquid level would
drop immediately to the level of liquid outside.
What if we setup a turbine on the route of water flow? Now the
liquid would turn the leaves of the turbine twice in a cycle: First
when the liquid is flowing upward, and the liquid is flowing downward.
We could have set up an electric brush that would adjust according to
the flow of liquid. Now then we will have an always positive flow of
electrical currency and store the energy to do useful work like
pumping the air out.
Would the output equal to the input in this case?(Assume ideal case
with no friction)
(A)The energy supplied by the pump during the air-out process=
volume* density of air* height of bottle,
(LD)The energy provided by the downward flow of liquid= volume*
density of liquid* height of the bottle
(LU)The energy provided by the upward flow of liquid= volume*
density of liquid* height of the bottle

Energy input=A= volume of air* density of air* height of bottle
Energy output=LD+LU= 2 *volume of liquid *density of liquid *height of bottle

Now the volume of air is identical to volume of liquid and height of
the bottle is same for both. However, that the density of liquid is
obvious higher than density of air. Thus we would have the Energy
output is more than input by the difference: (difference of density
between the liquid and air+ density of liquid)* volume* height of the
bottle.
If the amount of energy is completely converted into electrical
energy, the amount is more than enough to provide for the pump. How
would law of conservation of energy account for this?

Where do we get the extra energy from? In the surface it is the
energy from air(Atmospheric Pressure), upon further investigation we
discover we are actually extracting the energy from gravity and
thermal energy of the air. Now consider what would happen if we put a
APG on the upper opening of the bottle?

Incident in energy project

Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 5:44 PM
subject		urgent - fire at Inventor’s place

Dear All,

I strongly advise that we should inform Beijing about the fire at Mr. Chan’s place immediately. The agents are trained to cause accidents! The next accident is likely to be on human life - mine. Waiting for that to happen first will be too late.

This accident allowed them to take pictures and even take away the inventions. (or cover up any work already done.)

•

Comments 3

What are the common tactics of the Agents?

1. 1.

Temptation of Money, Sex, Reputation, Power

2.

Cause internal turmoil

3.

Outright destruction of property

4.

Harm to Individuals including family members

5.

Bad Publicity, half truths, rumors, etc.

6.

Copy Invention and disregard to Patents

7.

Support of Competitive Products

8.

Use of Military Secret or National Security excuses

Lawrence