Follow up on my satellite idea

Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 12:22 AM

This refer to my idea of extending the eyesight of satellite. Specifically, my ideas/inventions allow satellite to have 3D composite image of the ground without the need to change the orbit. This is just one supplement to that idea.
One technical problem would be the conservation of momentum, i.e. when the satellite has only one camera swinging back and fro, the satellite itself must move in opposite way to balance it. To solve this ‘technicality’, we just need a pair of camera swinging in opposite direction. However, given existing ‘camera’ tend to be the same size as the satellite itself. We need to redesign the satellite so that regardless of how the cameras move, the image is always focus in the same place. My idea is a hollow axis made of reflective material, which is capable of both held the camera, and allowing the light ray to enter the interior of the satellite for further processing. Combine with not-very-advance technology that exist today, nobody can evade from the eye in the sky.

The invention of an air-car

Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 6:32 PM

The idea of my air-car-engine is similar to existing car engine
since both of them run through 4 cycle, and for the smoothness of motion
we require more than one chamber. (like v-8 engine)
However, the difference is that this engine does NOT directly drive the
wheel, instead it is creating difference of air pressure in propelling the vechicle
forward. i.e. The motion of the wheel is driven by the air pressure, not the engine.
Preliminary design is one suction engine at the front, and one expulsion engine at
the back. The driver change direction by changing the direction of expulsion of the air.

The same idea could applied to any vechicle, with or without wheels. Thus its market
include all means of transportation: cars, trains, Rail, ship, boat and airplane.

The Magnetic Gun idea

Thu, May 26, 2005 at 11:45 AM

The first is a draft for an Magnetic Gun. Such a gun would use metal
with low Magnetic retentivity as bullet.  And inside the gun it has a
mini-super-generator initialize by a press of button. The most
important design are in the Projectile tube. It is essentially made up
of many partitions of electromagnetic. There is an electrical circuit
to control the polarity of each section.
To shot a bullet. The bullet is first Magnetized to be a mini
Magnet. Then at the terminus of the tube. A strong repulsive force is
generated by a Electromagnet of identical polarity. To oppose that
force, another strong Magnetic repulsive force is also created in the
partitions of electromagnetic. All of a sudden, the partitions of
electromagnetic change its polarity. As the bullet is propelling
forward, the partition behind the bullet change its polarity to repel
the bullet and the partition in front to attract the bullet.
However, as ordinary electromagnetic would have two polarity at the
same time, the challenge here is to disable the unwanted pole at the
required moment. One simple solution is to use suitable electrical
coil to neutralize the unwanted Magnetic pole at an instant. So the
electromagnetic here is actually permanent magnet with some
neutralizing circuit attached. I also assume here it is easy build
such a mini-ultra generator(I had some designs in mind), all the
energy produced is consumed at propelling the bullet.
This gun has the advantage of being more powerful(as powerful as we
want), with no explosive needed so it could operate under any
environment(even in space), little or no recoil(as the recoil force is
dissipate in the Magnetic field) and fast since it is controlled by
electronic but not physically means.

Innovative Concept in encryption

Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 5:56 PM

The puzzle box combination lock idea, if you can resolve the puzzle box to a specified pattern(i.e. from A state to B state: two keys), then you could use the same movement applied on the scrambled text to recover its content.
This idea, used along with distortion, would be easy on the computer for doing encryption, while difficult to impossible on the end of doing brute-force decryption, which fit perfectly to the principle of cryptology.

This is a follow up on the idea of my new encryption method.
My idea is to use the distortion itself as the content, yet another great addition of idea is to distort the arrangement of the content. Without the key, an e-mail of 100 letters including space would produce 100! of combination, along with the distortion as message principle would render any brute-force decryption impossible. Beside, this idea is easy to implement in any computer, does not require very high capability of CPU.
An extension of this idea is to use this recursively: Use one ‘encrypted’ letter as the key to another. The reference letter could be something extremely simple.

Innovation idea on Jul 14, 2005

Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 12:00 PM

1. About Rubix Cube, what if we have a ring of different to complete instead of square for identical color. Moreover, we could have a version made up of 2 by 2 by 2? The innovation is to combine two ideas into one, plus the solution doesn’t have to be identical color in the same ring. It could be of different color once, a particular arrangement. Furthermore, the manufacturer could also created variation, which have a different set of solution. Now we could have a series of Euler’s Cube instead of one, thus the game become more durable.
2. An extension of my idea of we can prevent Magnetization in a particular orientation by inserting non-magnetized material in Magnetizable material in the right way is that we could applied this concept into any field: Like Electrical or thermal or radiation. The concept is identical: insert a material that is not as readily affected by the particular field in such a way that block the formation of future fields of a particular orientation by breaking its ‘circuit’. With this idea we could build a metal that would only conduct heat in a particular fashion we designed. This material has the effect of creating a regular field in the face of random field strength from all direction, thus has an ordering effect.
3. Fluid Jet Engine concept that could be installed in any vehicle regardless of the medium they are moving in: Road, Air, Space and Water. It is different from conventional jet engine that it does NOT have emission, and need no exhaust. Therefore it could run for virtually unlimited distance with a fixed amount of liquid. This engine is NOT intended for existing fuel as it is running by electricity. It is in direct violation of Newton’s assertion that an object could NOT propel itself from the inside, thus all force is acting in a single direction. The principle is essential a Water Gun propelling an object from inside with its recoil, and a mechanism is there to eliminate the acting force by water on the wall of this object, which also recycle the water.

Innovation on Fluid Dynamic of 07/09/05

Sat, Jul 9, 2005 at 10:09 AM

Six new concepts that I dream up this morning when I was half awake.
First three concepts are modeling base on an a solid object with a network microscopic tunnel which every gate is controlled electronically so it could direct any fluid to any connected tunnel. Let’s name the channel system Euler’s Grid.
The first four concepts are related when we immerse the object into a fluid. Since we could control the flow of liquid, we could open the channel on the left half at the bottom so the fluid may enter. All the opening in the left and right surface are now closed. Now we could direct the fluid to the right by blocking the upward flow of the liquid while open the channel in the right. Due to action and reaction pair, this object will now move toward right. We could also direct the fluid to right if we want to move the object leftward. Suppose the grid is a rectangular one, we could direct the immersed object in any of the four directions we want. To increase the level of precision, we could also build a radial grid so we could turn the object clockwise and anti-clockwise to any degree we like. However, throughout the whole process, we does not exert any external force on the object. Nor we spend any energy in directing the flow of fluid. This is essentially a concept breakthrough in fluid dynamic, we could control any object’s movement immersed by controlling the flow of fluid inside. We are currently only deal with the vertically downward movement. Is it possibility to extend this concept to horizontal movement and upward movement? Why not?
For any upward moving object, we could similarly direct the fluid coming from the top to leftward or rightward thus moving the object to the opposite direction. Moreover, we can also control the upward velocity and impulse by closing and opening channel toward the bottom at any way we deem appropriate. Now, what we achieve is an object moving not just upward, but toward any direction in any speed by carefully controlling the fluid flow inside the object. Again, there is not much energy expenditure except the control system.
For the object moving in horizontal plane, we could similarly control the internal aerodynamic pressure pattern this object face, thus achieve the effect of turning the object to any direction, accelerate it forward or downward(by creating a drag or pull force) toward any direction exist in the channels. So we could now moving any object in any direction by this ‘Directed Internal Pressure’ model. We could achieve on-the-fly changing of direction with much less energy(and less detectable with no exhaust).
The extension of above concept is in the case of an object rolling instead linear movement, which the only difference is being more complicated than linear movement. The concept discuss above, nevertheless, still applicable.
Next two concepts are base on a hollow solid sphere with a percentage of volume filled with liquid of certain density. There is two application of concepts in this concept: 1. Directed Center of Gravity, 2. Randomized movement. There also exist a pump to pump out the liquid in any fashion like(in only one exit). What would happen if we start kicking this ball? As the ball rolling, the center of gravity is randomize by the presence of liquid of some proportion, thus randomize its movement. Now if we can reduce the level of percentage of liquid inside the ball at any rate we like, we could theoretically change the velocity and speed of the ball in any way we like. Just that we need a sensor inside the ball to detect what direction is the exit facing. Even we let the liquid flowing out at a constant rate, since the center of gravity is constantly changing in the process of moving the ball, we should definitely see something more than simple linear movement. Now the advanced concept is if there is a ball inside the ball, and it can pump the liquid back and fro between different ball?
The last concept is related to the following model. Inside a hollow rectangular metallic object, there exist a few metallic ball in constant collision with walls. Now we suppose there is a device we could adjust the electrical field on each of the wall independent, couldn’t we control the flow of metallic ball? By controlling the metallic ball we again could the movement of this object from the inside. For instance, we can propel this object forward by attracting the metallic balls to the front. Then the attraction force between the ball and the wall would draw the wall backward toward the balls. As the ball hit the wall, a forward momentum is gained by the object. Then to prevent the reaction of the ball from reaching the wall on the back, we should deflect them through the attraction force in the any of the other four walls. Wouldn’t we achieve controlling an object’s movement from inside?
All the examples of above is in violation of existing Physics laws, but they are all possible and fit with common sense. I called that Anti-Network Physics toy.
The extension of last concept is that we have sphere metallic ball which we could remotely control their charge, it is all possible within today’s technology. Now what would the picture become?

Fluid Dynamic invention of May 29, 2005

Sun, May 29, 2005 at 1:16 AM

Remember the concept of controlling the aerodynamic not through
the shape of an object but the engraving on the surface of the object?
i.e. We could control how the air flow by controlling the ‘resistance
to the wind’ at the surface of the object, while taken account of the
motion of the object. Now, two extensions I made with this original
concept:
First, we could turn the table and use the object’s surface engraving
and shape to GENERATE a pre-determine aerodynamic pattern, taken
account the object’s trajectory. For example, with the spiral pattern
on the surface, we could create a mini-storm on the path of the
object. It is making artificial weather one step close to reality.
Beside, we actually gain extra energy through the interaction of air
with the surface of the object. One possible invention is to power an
air powered generator through shooting of cylindrical object with
spiral engraving.(Euler’s Smart Aerodynamic Power Generator) Or an
aeroplane shooting objects like this to increase its forward thrust
(more than the backward momentum of this cylindrical object)
Second, we could actually use this method to create an aerodynamic
pressure pattern which change the trajectory of the flying object
itself. And a new branch of INTERACTIONS aerodynamic would need to
born to deal with the interaction between the aerodynamic drags and
pulls created by the surface of the flying object in its trajectory
WITH the trajectory itself.

Third, if there exist a way to change the engraving on the surface
during the course of flying, we found an energy-saving way to changing
the velocity of the flying object. Essentially, the only energy
required is the energy to change the surface pattern, otherwise we
enjoy the free ride   from the energy extracted by interaction of the
surface with the air. Imagine an air-plane actually generate
electricity through its own action!

The idea of Magnetic expolsion

Mon, May 23, 2005 at 3:37 PM

I would like claim the following conceptual innovation:
Magnetic/Electrical and Gravity explosion. We know how to generate
electricity from E/M/G field, effectively substitute the
energy-providing role of fuel. However, one problem of any
motor/propeller driven by these renewable energy have suffer from the
problem of lack of explosive properties, thus can not produce a sudden
surge of power. This is a proposal of resolving this difficulty:
Consider an electromagnet is on an enclosed Magnetic insulator tube
along with a fixed permanent magnet. When the electromagnet is not
charged, it would naturally be propelled toward that magnet. And the
velocity is increasing as it approach the Magnet. Now suppose we have
a electrical circuit which would change the polarity of the
electromagnet to be identical of the permanent magnet when they are
sufficiently close to each other, and depolarize the electromagnetic
when it is further than that distance. What will happen when the
electromagnetic is approaching the permanent magnet? It would be
accelerate until it reach the sparker, in which a great impulse is
exert by both magnet toward each other. This is what I term it as
magnetic explosion. It could effectively replace the explosion force
provided by the non-renewable fuel.
The distance from its target when the electromagnetic is
magnetize(sparking distance), strength of Magnetic fields and the time
it took for the electromagnetic to completely magnetize all determine
how powerful this explosion is.
The explosive force is given by: 2*B1*B2*k/D^2, the impulse is
2*B1*B2*t/D^2, the acceleration of the electromagnet is
2*B1*B2/(D^2*Mass of electromagnetic).
We could applied similar concept to electrical field(or using E and
M field at the same time), except we need excellent insulator between
the face expose to the static electrical field to prevent discharging.
Since Gravity does not have a repulsive component (not that in a way
we can easily utilize), the only way to stimulate explosion is by
sudden increase of mass or state of mass, which I am yet to find a way
to implement.
The application of this conceptual innovation is a Magnetic car
engine, everything is the same except we don’t have an igniter in the
ignition chamber, instead we use electromagnetic and a control circuit
and a sensor. To adjust the power, we should be able to adjust the
currency and sparking distance. Further improvement include putting E
field and M field into explosion at the same moment.

Follow up on Magnetic Vechicle idea

Wed, May 11, 2005 at 6:23 PM

In my conceptualization of a magnetic vehicle, any vehicle flow
through Earth’s Magnetic field line does NOT require any energy to
move from any point in that line to any other point in that line
provide there is a potential difference between them. If the vehicle
need to move in any other direction, it only require that the vehicle
to generate a magnetic field which is equal to the vector difference
between desired direction and existing field line. Could we extend
this concept into realm of gravity?
As we all understand, we don’t have an existing way of generating an
artificial gravity field line just like E-M field. Do we? Not until
yesterday which I realize that although the gravity is unchanged
toward the different physical state of an element, but the apparent
gravity acting  on this matter does VARY according to that state. i.e.
Air is generally less affect by gravity then liquid, as liquid compare
to solid. Imagine a   plane with many partitions of an element in
varieties of physical state at its bottom, we will see the plane tilt
according to the arrangement of states of that element. We are ABLE to
manipulate the effect of gravity by controlling the physical state of
matter. We should be able to construct a vehicle to travel WITHOUT
fuel by utilizing the differential response strength of the different
state of same/different element. The principle we utilize here is that
any mass would have a tendency to move from a place of higher
gravitational potential energy to lower gravitational potential
energy. We just need a calculator to decide the respective
‘potential’, an implementation circuit to create the potentialities,
and a monitor to maintain the potentialities.

Innovative idea on Food Processing

Wed, May 11, 2005 at 6:23 PM

Random process is inherent in the manufacturing of many food
product. Traditional wisdom has us to minimize the level of random
fluctuation to provide a constant standard. Is that really so bad that
each product may taste slightly different from other of the same
brand? When people do Q.C., they seem to forgot that each of us have a
slightly different taste for the same product. And constant standard
could also translate to customer’s tasting bud as boring,
unchallenged; especially if it is for a product people generally have
a wide varieties of taste, like coffee and tea. Instead of try to
alleviating the artificial problem of constant taste, why can’t we
kill two birds in one stone by utilizing the natural random
fluctuation to provide the varieties which some food product demands?
For instant, instead of doing a survey to impose the average amount of
sugar, milk and tea in Milk-Tea, why couldn’t the manufacture WIDEN
the range of natural occurring variation thus each customer would have
a slightly different tasted product? Wouldn’t it fix people’s natural
tendency of expecting variety and randomness? We thus don’t need a
billion-valued machinery design to equalizing all product(then make
several more for people with different taste), rather we let the
customer enjoy the same product in different ways at different times.