An good idea from someone else: PDG

(From: http://newnewhkcc1976.wordpress.com/2008/08/20/follow-up-on-invention-pdg-by-parallel-path/)

This article refer to this design, there is a slight mistake, so the correct design for N-2 should be like this:

Be careful with 6 things:

1. The arrangement of magnets, you can guess it is N-S-N-S; the top magnet and bottom magnet should be the same polarity(N-N,S-S…)

2. If the volume of the IRON core within electromagnetic coil is 1, then the one in the middle should be 4.(That is the most critical part, all effect depend on this part)

3. That would be some tricks to do with rotating the rotor. Since there is iron and magnet, the rotation would NOT be smooth, it would be jerky. That would shorten the motor’s life cycle.
Do NOT use a motor DIRECTLY on the rotor, otherwise you can NOT see the Overunity effect. You need something like those in the bicycle so Motor can accelerate the rotor , but the rotor can move freely on its own.
i.e. The Rotor can move FASTER than the motor.
(If you don’t understand, say so and I will try to fetch a picture from the Internet. It is a very common device seen on bicycle so it move forward without human pedaling)
4. The longer the distance between the middle iron bar and two magnets, the weaker the Overunity effect. So it should be as close as possible.

5. Try with resistance-type loading first, induction-type later. I done many experiments with these, it usually work better on the former.

6. For testing, you can try with load connect to coils or close the circuit. The expected result should be higher than load, and the Overunity effect get BETTER. (i.e. The loading is on while the rotor is running faster and faster) Therefore if you doesn’t see a good effect with the small loading, then try with close the circuit.

Sorry, I done wrong calculation in the original proposal, I forgot that the coils would react to two magnets, i.e. the upper coil would be drag by lower magnet, and vice versa.
Because of the distance, assume it is 20%. So total drag force in N-2=2.4

also that the middle iron would interact with 2 magnet, producing net propelling force.
So total positive drag force=-4*.6*2=4.8

The net force forward=4.8-2.4=2.4
Amplification ratio= 2
(Notice that the Amplification ratio is fixed regardless of the efficiency which K.E. of magnet is ‘converted ‘to electrical energy of electromagnetic coil. I disagree with the name convert.)

Assume 8 magnet per round, and initial RPM=1,
The RPM at the last magnet of first circle= 256(if not exceed the Physical limit of Rotor)

C.O.P= Maximum physical output/initial input

With these 6 taken care of of we are good to go!!!

We call this design M-2(since there are two pair of magnet, and M refer to the name of builder.) Since the building of M-2, I am already dreaming of M-2*2 which has amplification of 16, even combining the idea from this one(Haven’t know how yet…).

We can even design a car base on this, all we need is just a energy banks on the way to deposit the excessive electrical energy produced.

The opposit of Euler’s Coil Technology

(Use arrangement of electromagnetic coils to prevent entrance of electrical current. Acting as an infinite resistor.)

My idea for an cloth-friendly Drying machine

The idea that dried all cloth COMPLETELY and THROUGHLY.

dmi

Hydroelectric idea of today:2007.06.01

hydroidea070601

Conceptual innovation: 2007/05/24

The basic idea is to prove that gravitational energy could be extracted from this setup. The technicality is the appropriate timing of allowing the electromagnetic coils to react to the magnet in the swinging object, we need to prevent the coils from holding the swinging object stationary.

ci070524

Moreover, this experiment can also prove that the kinetic energy and electrical energy from electromagnetic coil could be separate from each other functionally, and we can then re-use the kinetic energy due that is created as the by-product of electrical generation process for another round of electrical generation.

Thus, with suitable controlling electrical circuit, this could the world’s simplest Gravity-Energy-Generator. The swinging would swing indefinitely in the middle, and we could continually produce electrical energy from two electromagnetic coil. That would pose tough question for those who believe in law of conservation of energy, since the amount of electrical energy produce is unlimited, and there is no external energy enter into the system.

Now, is the conservation of law of energy being violated? It is violated if we accept the notion that electrical generation process is about converting kinetic energy to electrical energy.

Magical Transformer+Euler’s Coil Technology

The idea of Magical Transformer is to let electromagnetic coil vibrate between Permanent magnets so to ‘extract’ magnetic energy from the magnetic field from them. Ideally, we could place two Permanent magnets with the same poles facing each end of the electromagnetic coil, so the electromagnetic coil would vibrate when there is a variation of the electromagnetic field of the electromagnetic coil.
As we all remember that, the idea of Euler’s Coil Technology is to use configuration and alignment of the electromagnetic coils to produce a strengthening effect of the variation of individual electromagnetic coil. What happen if we combine two ideas together?
i.e. Instead of placed only electromagnetic coil between the Permanent magnets, we can place two of them in parallel or three of them as a triangle, or fourth of them as in a square; then use only one electromagnetic coil as the source coil. Due to mutual induction, all of them will produce the same variation of magnetic polarities in two ends, and then all of them would experience the same attracting and repelling forces from both magnets in two ends alternatively. However the effect of the magnet have on the electromagnetic coil, it would be amplified by the configuration of electromagnetic coil. Thus we expect the amplitude of the oscillation of the electromagnetic coils would increase, and more electrical energy output from the electromagnetic coils.

An alternative explanation for Magical Transformer

In Lawrence’s Magical Transformer design, an electromagnetic coil is lead to vibrate in a Magnetic field to produce excess more electrical energy output than input. He has a set of lead-in, lead-out theory on how does the process yell more output than input. Here is my alternative explanation for that phenomena:

Consider the case which an electromagnetic coil is connected to A.C. supply without presence of any Permanent Magnet. What happen is simply the magnetic field generated by the electromagnetic coil oscillation according to the oscillation of the input electrical current. However, since electromagnetic coil has self-inductance which resist any variation of magnetic field therefore the inputting electrical current, therefore it consistently drain electrical energy from the A.C. supply just to maintain an oscillating magnetic field in the electromagnetic coil. Technically Speaking, it is when the supply is alternating the electrical current, a resisting EMF is felt by the supply from the electromagnetic coil.

On the other end, when we have place a permanent magnet in the one end of the electromagnetic coil, and the electromagnetic coil is attached in such a way that it is allowed to move away or toward the permanent magnet. The electrical current in the electromagnetic coil will now experience two source of influence: One is the resisting EMF by the coil to resist any change in electrical current, Second is the resisting EMF brought by the movement of the coil itself.

Consider the case which one end of the coil is polarize to N, which cause it move away from the N pole of the Magnet. Now the first part of resisting EMF is the opposite direction of the changed in electrical current, therefore it is in the direction of S. For the second part, since the coil is moving away from the magnet, therefore the coil would produce an EMF resisting this change. Thus, the effect is an additional resisting EMF in the direction of S is produced. Although they added together in this time, don’t forgot that the first has a much faster responding time than the later one. Is that possible when an electromagnetic coil of certain mass is oscillating at certain ‘resonance’ frequency, the effect of second resisting EMF is always in the opposition direction the first EMF, thus canceling any effect of self-inductance of the electromagnetic coil? Essentially, what Lawrence has achieved in his Magical Transformer is an electromagnetic coil with zero inductance, thus no electrical energy is wasted in fighting the self-inductance of the electromagnetic coil. What is originally lost now appear as electrical gained from the process.

Another hypothesis is what Lawrence has achieved is by using this physical setup so a particular oscillation pattern of the magnetic field is easily produced, and imposed on the electromagnetic coil. And in that particular pattern of oscillation of electromagnetic field, extra electromagnetic energy is resonant into the system?

Which is a better explanation?

My invention base on Double stage Oscillation

Guess how it is operated, it is intended to save human labor:

gdfdesign

Reactionless Propulsion System

This invention project is what I cooperating with an English inventor Paul Toomer. His idea of U-tube fascinating me.

His website:
http://magnetic.free.energy.mysite.freeserve.com/
http://www.ufoseek.com/cgi-bin/jump.cgi?ID=1830

The Draft Patent:
rps

An illustration:

A new kind of inductance?

My ideas on varied induction related to Lawrence’s idea of Magical transformer.

http://eulertruthbible.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/design080527-1.jpg

http://eulertruthbible.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/design080527-2.jpg

More proposed experiments:

thought070914