The process of flotation

This is written as a sequel to my last discussion on flotation, the theoretical breakthrough I have is that the gravity force acting on water molecule is NOT negligible as stated in Advance Physics. Just like air molecules, all of the water molecules is accelerating downward at 9.8/s; the only difference is a stronger bonding force between water molecules tend to wear down the effect of gravity, thus giving an impression that water is act as many layers stacked together. And the layer is responding as if it is elastic. Since gravity is unidirectional, thus the elasticity must be coming from the electromagnetic forces acting as spring between the molecules. How does that related to the process of flotation?

In my last article, I suppose that as an non-water-permeable object immersed in water, it would first push out the water molecules nearest to it. Since the gravity has a stronger effect on the object than the water molecules surrounding it, therefore it is squeezing the water molecules just beneath it. Notice that the surface tension is elicited by difference of acceleration by gravity between the object and water molecule which is also depending on the variation of the strength of the horizontal bonding force in respond to their difference in acceleration.

Undeniably, some water molecules would be accelerate downward by the object, while other pushed side-ward. While part of the later would pass the momentum sideways, other dissipate their momentum by pushing other water molecules upward, thus we see the rising of water near the immersed object. As the former travel sideways, they continually dissipate the momentum by pushing other upward or sideways. Undeniably, some of those kinetic energy lost as thermal energy. Thus, some part of gravitational energy from the object has heated up the surrounding water. If those travel sideway eventually reach unmovable solid mass like land, part of gravitational force is absorbed by land mass as heat. As the unmovable solid mass bounce back, the object immersed in water get a temporary lift. As stated in last article, some part of the weight is ‘cancel’ by water streams accelerated by the object running into each other,

The conclusion is by taken into consideration of the gravity’s effect on water molecules, part of the flotation force is coming from the rebound effect of the land mass at the bottom of ocean, part of the weight of the object is used to heating up the water.

To test this hypothesis, we can try an experiment which a heavy object with lower density than water is slowly immersed into the water inside a bottle. Then in a thermal insulated environment, we can measure the change of temperature in the process of flotation, then we can also measure the water pressure at the side of bottle. In according to the discussion above, we should expect both of them to be rise as the result. Also, we can break bottle by immersing the object if the object is massive enough.

Anyone like to do this experiment?

Innovation on energyfromair at Apr 22, 2005

Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 11:34 PM

This is yet another Patent claim by Euler. After my attempt to
create a mechanism that could use the rotational motion of one mass to
shift the rim of another circular mass, I now created an invention not
just able to shift the rim of another circular mass then return to its
original position, but also extracting gravitational energy in the
process. So it is really the process of a rotational object shift a
swing to shift yet another rotational object. I got two conceptual
innovation from that:
1. Theoretically, this process could take place interminably, and each
rotation would increase in speed and magnitude, thus drawing more and
more gravitational power (Power= energy/time), until we reach the
physical limit of the rotating object.
2. With a little modification, we could change the direction of
rotation of the second rotating object. We could thus control where
and to which direction the pulse force is applied.
3. By placing this device in different angle, we can control the
phasing of the pulse force. Now imagine if there is a simple way to
change the angular location with respect to the center of the first
rotating object.
4. Imagine if this device is itself rotating around the first rotating
mass and connected to another rotating mass, because of yet another
pulse force. We would observe that the second rotating mass is
changing its rotating frequency in sync of the frequency of the
rotation of this device.
5. By placing the same device in many different angles with respect to
the center of the first rotating object, we can control the timing of
the pulse force in a different way from 3.
6. With yet another modification, we could also change the frequency
of the pulse force applied compare to the rotational frequency of the
first object, as well as the strength of the pulse force compare to
the torque of the first rotational object.
7. By connected many of this device in many angle with respect to the
center of the first rotating object to many other independently
rotating mass, we can control the phase of pulse force in many
different rotating mass.

To summarize, I found a way to control the phase, frequency,
strength , the power output and the direction of the pulse force
applied to any number of rotating masses connected via this device. If
we could found a way to feedback the second rotational momentum to the
first one, we should see the world’s self-accelerating physical
system. And we should expect this system reach its maximum capacity
within 5 feedback cycle. Who say we can’t use the swing to push yet
another swing to yet another swing…?
With the combination of pulse circuit and clever engineering, I
could produce something much much more powerful than electrical
control could produce. Who is to say I shouldn’t feel proud of myself?

Another explanation for Lawrence’s invention

Mon, Apr 4, 2005 at 3:04 AM

This is my second attempt to theorize the process of how Lawrence’s invention generate electricity.

One critical problem I have forgot all along is the timing of electrical, magnetic and gravity force. Does it require time for a mass to react to another object’s gravity field? If I remember accurately, it require some time for E-M field to reach an object react to E-M field. If we could found out what time it take for such an reaction to happen, we could win a second Nobel prize.
In here, I would assume here gravity does NOT take any time to ‘travel’ from an object to another object. My hypothesis is that when kinetic energy is transfer to become electrical energy, there is a momentarily slow down of the swing. However, at the same time, the tension in the metal react to this slowing down and provide upward force require to counter gravity. And as kinetic energy is transfer to electrical energy at the same time, the tension(or construction energy) is drawn once again to support the momentum of moving upward. Then it reach the maximum it is possible to attain. This should be the place where potential energy is equal to kinetic energy plus the construction energy we exert through the circular motion.
As it begin to swing downward, the gravity is acting against the tension to push the swing downward. However, with the addition of tension resulted in a clockwise circular motion toward the point of equilibrium. Now gravity is accelerating the swing, which cutting through the magnetic lines. In that process, the kinetic energy is transfer to electrical energy. Then there should a momentarily slowing decrease of acceleration of the swing. However, as soon as the gravity ‘discover’ that swing is not accelerate(instantly) proportional to its mass(or some atoms in the swing felt that gravity is temporarily losing contact with it), a process is initialized to ‘fill-in-the-gap’ of that lose acceleration. Actually, it maybe the tension(incompressibility) of the metal first ‘detect’ this lost of gravity, therefore it react by pushing the swing outward. Therefore, I suppose that there maybe a continuously fluctuation of the acceleration and the speed of the swing that is detectable by VERY SENSITIVE equipment (provide that the equipment itself does NOT distort the parameter it want to measure). This delicate balance of gain and loss take place until the swing has reach its equilibrium point, which the accumulate enough energy to miss it. The same thing repeat itself on the other side.
Now I have two hypothesis:
1. Either the atom in the metal swing or Earth’s atom ‘detect’ and REACT to the reduction of gravity due to ‘lose’;
2. The Tension of the metal first react to the lose of gravity, and since it can’t be compress, it react by providing an impulse to push the swing object outward and downward;
3. Some complex interaction between Tension and Gravity.

Keep going this way, we are digging into the quantum reality of gravity. My general direction is by taking the microscopic picture of what really happen at each moment of the metal and swing. However, all is hypothesis without an experiment to test it, which is the first experiment I will do after the company laboratory is created. Seriously, if any of us could found an accurate description of this phenomena that is proven by experiment, the Nobel Prize of Physics within our reach. I guess you wouldn’t mind sharing a part of it to help patent my invention

Innovation of Wed, Apr 13, 2005

Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 2:04 AM

1. Using the phenomena that different density of air has different
reflective index, through clever manipulate the concentration of a
dissoluble substance in water across time, we could change the
apparent location of an object from the other side. We could even make
an animation of a physically static object. If the concentration is
too difficult to control, we could at least control the temperature of
water across time. Through changing the water temperature we could
changing the apparent location of a physically static object.
Conversely, by observing the direction of movement of an presumed
static object moving, we could make some guess of the differential
concentration or temperature of a liquid. This concept applies to any
fluid. Moreover, if we have two layer of water that has different
temperature, we can observe how an object move as the result of
temperature change.
The implementation? Easy, just a water tank divided into many
independent partitions each with its temperature control, and some
sort of temperature changing appliance in each layer.

2. This is a new application of selective permeable membrane: Power
generation. How? The principle is permeable member will only permit
only one substance of a mixture to go through, while keeping the other
substance to stay. Thus without atmospheric pressure(external applied
pressure) of both in equal pressure, the height of liquid partition
is likely to rise. Now if remove the membrane when the process is
completed, there is a lose of potential energy from the higher side to
lower side which we can extract to transform to other form of energy
like electricity. It would be even better if we could control the
selectivity of that membrane, then we could the flow the substance. By
alternating between two selectivity, we could have constantly
unbalance potential energy to extract energy from.

Hypothesis on Inertia as the Basis of Overunity

This idea is more like a theoretical guess: The problem of neg electable. We see this term a lot in physics textbook; whether it be wave, magnetic, electrical force and gravity. If neg electable among to zero there, then I have a concept of using this source of energy.
My hypothesis is when an object with a lot of mass met an object with only 10^-5 of it’s mass. The gravity, which is theoretically bi-directional, in reality become uni-direction. What I concern here is if there exist a threshold of ratio which anything below would practically become zero in its effect? If it is the case, we see energy is transfer from the gravity of the big object to small object, and there is a net kinetic energy gain in one of them, which we could utilize it to do useful work. For instance, by applying a magnetic field across its path. It is not that momentum is not conserved, just that the reaction of the massive object is too slight that maybe the vibration within this object already canceled its effect out. The same principle could apply to electro-magnetic force. As one interesting feature is that any object moving toward the gravity well will NOT decelerate no matter how its kinetic energy is extracted to do other work. This is the theoretical explanation of how gravity electricity generator works.

Most accurate formula to calculate energy from gravity

Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 12:02 AM

Hi everyone in energyfromair.com,
Through some knowledge of differentiation and integration, I have
derive the following formula to calculate the gravitational energy
extracted from one single rotation of a non-cylindrical mass.
For a hollow circle with R as the outside radius and r as the inner
radius,    E=40/3*(R^3-r^3)/(R^2-r^2)
This formula will be more accurate than E=2MGR.

Osmosis, Entropy, Life, Energy and Information

I still remember vividly that a demonstration of the power of Biological entity: Through the use of selectively permeable member, organism could develop a differential gradient between the intracellular and extracellular in terms of various mineral. A famous demonstration which listed in all Biology book is that using selectively permeable member, it is able to build up a column of water in the midst of glucose solution. It is tempting to me for describing the microscopic process in detail just like ‘how salt dissolve in water’, but I save it for another article. What I interested here is the relationships between them.The first thought I am coming up with that demonstration is NOT the power of separation, but how Biological entity to create energy against gravity. i.e. Just by using a special chemical structure, Biological entity was able to supply the energy necessary for the water molecules to climb up against gravity. The initial impression of Biological entity able to create energy later give away to the idea that Biological entity was using the chemical potential energy inherent in the selectively permeable itself to  help the redistribution of thermal energy among water molecules. Thus it is able to accumulate water inside the selectively permeable member because the bio-chemical properties of the selective permeable member in its interaction with water molecules, was able to ‘encourage’ or simply allow the re-distribution of thermal energy. I was thinking at that time if somehow the selectivity of the member could be adjusted according to the situation, then Biological organism would have an endless supply of energy from the source of gravity. Thus it is buffing to me why doesn’t evolution take advantage of that so energy intake is no longer necessary for Biology entity? Another deeper thought is energy, as defined by ability to do work(change), is only possible because of Osmosis process. So, in this sense, Osmosis is indeed creating energy.
Separation and Differentiation of material is also the basis of entropy and time. Time defined in Physics as process of irreversible. Thus time is also possible due to the existence of Bio-Chemical structures that could differential. It appears to me not just Bio-Chemical structures that has the potentiality to differential between materials, some Physical structures also has similar capability. In fact, if we view Physics and Mathematics as the umbrella which all Physical science united, then the possibility of time/entropy/life is inherent embedded in the Mathematics of structure of atoms and the nature of force fields themselves. Life is possible because Universe predispose it to life, I am not going into the Anthropological Principle here.
Lastly, Separation and Differentiation not just made life and time possible, but also made information possible. Theory of Information demand the difference of difference make a difference. Without another difference as the basis, there is no sense in talking about difference of a difference. Unlike Life and Time, Information is built on an abstract layer of similar process and principles.
Since all of them require the process and mechanism of Separation and Differentiation, I then wonder if any inter-relationship between them. Osmosis made Entropy, Life, Energy and Information possible. Life again require energy to work against the natural tendency of increasing Entropy. Thus, in a sense Life is reversing Time. Since Time is defined by the increase of Entropy, therefore Life could determine the direction of flow of Time. Information require some sentential entity to make sense of the Outside world, and strike to keep the inside in the order beneficial to Life itself. That sentential object must at least posses the ability of building an abstract map of the outside world, which is the beginning of Psychology. The role of Energy in here seems to be a central component here, Entropy is about the possibility of usage of energy. Life is essentially a struggle of using constructive Energy against destructive Energy. Energy, is similar in vein with Information since both require a difference of difference to make a difference. Could we therefore see Energy in terms of Information? Thus we can draw up a roughly accurate sequence here: Life is prerequisite of Information, Energy and Osmosis is prerequisite of Life, Entropy is prerequisite of (usefulness of) Energy. They may look very different from each other, but in a sense they are tied together
closely and naturally. They maybe merely difference face of the same unifying principle.

Ideas of Second Stage Oscillator

Sun, Jun 3, 2007 at 11:28 PM

My observation on Double-Stage Oscillation Phenomena

Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 4:58 PM

The double oscillation phenomena we discuss here refer to this website: http://www.rexresearch.com/milkovic/milkovic.htm
Through an invention someone is able to amplify ten times of the input, this thesis attempt to understand its underlying mechanism. This thesis at current stage is at best immature, please forgave me for that.
The name Double Stage Oscillation derived from the sense that there are 2 oscillations: 1 is the oscillation in the horizontal plane by the pendulum, 2 is the oscillation in the vertical direction by the counter weight in the output side. The general impression would the 1st oscillation has caused the 2nd oscillation, although actually it is an iteration of 1st and 2nd feedback into each other . So a better term should be a oscillation within a oscillation. It should be consider along with the question which I raised 2 years ago: ‘What if the strength of gravity varies in according to the phase of a pendulum?’, i.e. When it is falling from the top position, the strength of gravity is on the increase until the pendulum reach the lowest point; and when it rise again, we decrease the strength of gravity field in according to the position of the pendulum. The result of DO experiment seems to confirm my initial guess: There would be an increase of kinetic energy in the pendulum. If there is no energy cost to vary the gravity field in according to the motion of pendulum, we could be amazed at the excessive kinetic energy coming from nowhere.
While I was pondering about this phenomena, I remember that 2 years ago an inventor has proposed that gravity energy could be extracted through oscillation. And different oscillations would have different efficiency in extracting the gravity energy. It thus appears to me that DO inventor has found an efficient way to oscillate energy out of gravity field. And contrary to established Physics, the route which the an object took in gravity field is related to the total amount of energy exchange. Gravity could behave as an non-conservative field, or gravity itself is not a conservative field to begin with. It is only because the limitation of our experiments apparatus and the location of our experiment(always close to Earth) that gravity appear to be conservative.
We could say gravity is in heart an oscillation of force field, and if we closely match the ‘natural’ oscillation from gravity, and the oscillation we induced then we achieve a resonance. At resonance, the excessive energy is coming from the gravity itself. What remain as a question is: Could we use that to reveal the frequency of gravity oscillation?
I previously had suspect that it is the constant ‘conflict’ of force between gravity and electromagnetism in the microscopic cause the undetectable oscillation. I need to reconsider that observation along with this new line of thinking.
Another hypothesis, it is actually a crude guess. 1st Oscillation: g*sin angle, 2nd oscillation g*(sin angle)^2. Since it is known that the strength of gravity and electromagnetic field is inversely proportional to the distance squared from Center of Gravity. Therefore if the variation of oscillation in the direction parallel to field line took the form of X^2(the meaning of X within X), it is thus a closer match to the natural variation of gravity. It follow from this hypothesis that Triple/Quadruple Oscillation wouldn’t obtain a better I/O ration than 10.(It is also interesting that is a 10, which is close to theoretical value of g.) My alternative hypothesis is that we could obtain a better output ratio: Double=10, Triple=100, Quadruple=1000… etc.
(And I does has a method to test this hypothesis by building n-th Stage Oscillator)
Something continue to haunt me: Why gravity from 3-D objects has the dimensionality of only 2? Gravity only exist in 2-D? or Gravity is a wave that only propagate in 2 dimension? All known force field operate at 2-D, why do we live in a 3-D world?

08/05/10 update: The official explanation: nebojsa_simin_paper_free_energy_of_the_oscillating_pendulum-lever_system

Experiment on Pendulum motion

Hypothesis:
In a pendulum, If we replace Thread with spring, and we let the spring oscillate with a mass it carries.
Then we swing the pendulum.

If the frequency of oscillation of the spring is a ‘good match’ with the swinging motion of pendulum.
We would thus obtain resonance. Which is another demonstration of Double Stage oscillation, and LT’s invention is based on that.