Innovation on energyfromair at Apr 22, 2005

Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 11:34 PM

This is yet another Patent claim by Euler. After my attempt to
create a mechanism that could use the rotational motion of one mass to
shift the rim of another circular mass, I now created an invention not
just able to shift the rim of another circular mass then return to its
original position, but also extracting gravitational energy in the
process. So it is really the process of a rotational object shift a
swing to shift yet another rotational object. I got two conceptual
innovation from that:
1. Theoretically, this process could take place interminably, and each
rotation would increase in speed and magnitude, thus drawing more and
more gravitational power (Power= energy/time), until we reach the
physical limit of the rotating object.
2. With a little modification, we could change the direction of
rotation of the second rotating object. We could thus control where
and to which direction the pulse force is applied.
3. By placing this device in different angle, we can control the
phasing of the pulse force. Now imagine if there is a simple way to
change the angular location with respect to the center of the first
rotating object.
4. Imagine if this device is itself rotating around the first rotating
mass and connected to another rotating mass, because of yet another
pulse force. We would observe that the second rotating mass is
changing its rotating frequency in sync of the frequency of the
rotation of this device.
5. By placing the same device in many different angles with respect to
the center of the first rotating object, we can control the timing of
the pulse force in a different way from 3.
6. With yet another modification, we could also change the frequency
of the pulse force applied compare to the rotational frequency of the
first object, as well as the strength of the pulse force compare to
the torque of the first rotational object.
7. By connected many of this device in many angle with respect to the
center of the first rotating object to many other independently
rotating mass, we can control the phase of pulse force in many
different rotating mass.

To summarize, I found a way to control the phase, frequency,
strength , the power output and the direction of the pulse force
applied to any number of rotating masses connected via this device. If
we could found a way to feedback the second rotational momentum to the
first one, we should see the world’s self-accelerating physical
system. And we should expect this system reach its maximum capacity
within 5 feedback cycle. Who say we can’t use the swing to push yet
another swing to yet another swing…?
With the combination of pulse circuit and clever engineering, I
could produce something much much more powerful than electrical
control could produce. Who is to say I shouldn’t feel proud of myself?

Another explanation for Lawrence’s invention

Mon, Apr 4, 2005 at 3:04 AM

This is my second attempt to theorize the process of how Lawrence’s invention generate electricity.

One critical problem I have forgot all along is the timing of electrical, magnetic and gravity force. Does it require time for a mass to react to another object’s gravity field? If I remember accurately, it require some time for E-M field to reach an object react to E-M field. If we could found out what time it take for such an reaction to happen, we could win a second Nobel prize.
In here, I would assume here gravity does NOT take any time to ‘travel’ from an object to another object. My hypothesis is that when kinetic energy is transfer to become electrical energy, there is a momentarily slow down of the swing. However, at the same time, the tension in the metal react to this slowing down and provide upward force require to counter gravity. And as kinetic energy is transfer to electrical energy at the same time, the tension(or construction energy) is drawn once again to support the momentum of moving upward. Then it reach the maximum it is possible to attain. This should be the place where potential energy is equal to kinetic energy plus the construction energy we exert through the circular motion.
As it begin to swing downward, the gravity is acting against the tension to push the swing downward. However, with the addition of tension resulted in a clockwise circular motion toward the point of equilibrium. Now gravity is accelerating the swing, which cutting through the magnetic lines. In that process, the kinetic energy is transfer to electrical energy. Then there should a momentarily slowing decrease of acceleration of the swing. However, as soon as the gravity ‘discover’ that swing is not accelerate(instantly) proportional to its mass(or some atoms in the swing felt that gravity is temporarily losing contact with it), a process is initialized to ‘fill-in-the-gap’ of that lose acceleration. Actually, it maybe the tension(incompressibility) of the metal first ‘detect’ this lost of gravity, therefore it react by pushing the swing outward. Therefore, I suppose that there maybe a continuously fluctuation of the acceleration and the speed of the swing that is detectable by VERY SENSITIVE equipment (provide that the equipment itself does NOT distort the parameter it want to measure). This delicate balance of gain and loss take place until the swing has reach its equilibrium point, which the accumulate enough energy to miss it. The same thing repeat itself on the other side.
Now I have two hypothesis:
1. Either the atom in the metal swing or Earth’s atom ‘detect’ and REACT to the reduction of gravity due to ‘lose’;
2. The Tension of the metal first react to the lose of gravity, and since it can’t be compress, it react by providing an impulse to push the swing object outward and downward;
3. Some complex interaction between Tension and Gravity.

Keep going this way, we are digging into the quantum reality of gravity. My general direction is by taking the microscopic picture of what really happen at each moment of the metal and swing. However, all is hypothesis without an experiment to test it, which is the first experiment I will do after the company laboratory is created. Seriously, if any of us could found an accurate description of this phenomena that is proven by experiment, the Nobel Prize of Physics within our reach. I guess you wouldn’t mind sharing a part of it to help patent my invention

Hypothesis on Inertia as the Basis of Overunity

This idea is more like a theoretical guess: The problem of neg electable. We see this term a lot in physics textbook; whether it be wave, magnetic, electrical force and gravity. If neg electable among to zero there, then I have a concept of using this source of energy.
My hypothesis is when an object with a lot of mass met an object with only 10^-5 of it’s mass. The gravity, which is theoretically bi-directional, in reality become uni-direction. What I concern here is if there exist a threshold of ratio which anything below would practically become zero in its effect? If it is the case, we see energy is transfer from the gravity of the big object to small object, and there is a net kinetic energy gain in one of them, which we could utilize it to do useful work. For instance, by applying a magnetic field across its path. It is not that momentum is not conserved, just that the reaction of the massive object is too slight that maybe the vibration within this object already canceled its effect out. The same principle could apply to electro-magnetic force. As one interesting feature is that any object moving toward the gravity well will NOT decelerate no matter how its kinetic energy is extracted to do other work. This is the theoretical explanation of how gravity electricity generator works.

Given a chance to change society

Mar 29, 2005 6:01 AM

Hello Sir,

Attached is the Book being reviewed by the Chinese Economists. It is
209 pages. The only chance to digest it properly is to print it out
and discuss a small section with your friends at one time.

The concepts described in the Book illustrate possible ways to move to
the Wisdom Society. Modern Wealth is the quality and quantity of
meaningful economic activities. Such Wealth is infinite
theoretically.

Regards,
Lawrence Tseung

Most accurate formula to calculate energy from gravity

Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 12:02 AM

Hi everyone in energyfromair.com,
Through some knowledge of differentiation and integration, I have
derive the following formula to calculate the gravitational energy
extracted from one single rotation of a non-cylindrical mass.
For a hollow circle with R as the outside radius and r as the inner
radius,    E=40/3*(R^3-r^3)/(R^2-r^2)
This formula will be more accurate than E=2MGR.

Discussion on Magical Transformer

Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 2:14 PM

Alternative Explanation of Swinging Pendulum

Fri, Apr 1, 2005 at 7:29 PM

Hi friends,
Just a little more: I think the role of the rope that hold the swing is what we constant ignore. I believe I have found the missing key. Probably the first person on Earth.
Suppose we start the swing in the ground level, then push it to either side of the rim. At the impulse, we apply a force which originally move the object horizontal WITHOUT any rope holding the swing. However, from Pyth. theorem and the limited extensibility of the rope(fixed length of the rope), it is the tension in the rope which provide the energy to move the swing upward. Particularly, it is the vertical component of the tension that provide the upward force require to raise its height. In order for the swing to move sideway, however, that the pulse force must be GREATER than the horizontal component of the tension provided by the rope. At the same time, since the rope is moving upward, the vertical component of tension MUST OVERCOME the force of gravity. The angle widen as the swing moving toward left/right. And as it widen, the vertical component of tension continue to decrease; while the horizontal component of tension continue to increase. The former is what we use to overcome gravity which gradually lose out to the constant gravity, while the later which the rope deploy to keep its equilibrium position is gradually overcome the pulse force we applied. At the highest point, gravity force is equal to the vertical component of tension, thus it become instantaneous motionless. However, when this happen the horizontal component of tension have already OVERCOME the pulse force, thus the swing is moving back to its equilibrium position. The timing of these two event is the key to what happen. We could imagine scenario of different sequence of these two event and see if what will happen.
Now the horizontal component of tension is moving the rope opposite to the direction impose by the pulse force. Since the rope itself is incompressible, plus GRAVITY is providing for the tension of the rope, it thus LOWER the position of the swing. Without the rope, the swing would have move only horizontally on the same plane. Without GRAVITY acting on the rope to prevent itself from relaxing, the swing will NOT lower its height. We have ‘cheated’ the GRAVITATIONAL energy here!
As there is no pulse force(it’s completely dispersed) to resist the horizontal component of tension, and by Newton’s First Law of motion, the tension would move the swing pass its equilibrium position. And the angle become widen again. Again, due to the inextensibility of the rope and Pyth. Theorem, this horizontal component of tension is making the swing move upward. What provide the energy of the raising action? The energy was partially loan (there is a time difference between them)by gravity when the swing is forced to move downward, and partially come from the electromagnetic attraction between the molecules. Without gravity, the swing would move away from equilibrium indefinitely until the horizontal component of the tension reduce to zero(as the angle widen). But this time gravity play a slightly different role, the gravity itself does NOT directly pull the swing back to its equilibrium position, instead it is acting against the upward movement of the swing due to the inextensibility of the rope. As the angle widen, the vertical component of tension is continuously decreasing while the horizontal component of tension is continuously increase. Originally, when the decaying vertical component is just enough to cancel out the gravity, the swing has reached its maximum height. However, even at that moment, the horizontal component is still accelerate the movement of swing upward, thus passing the maximum height point which gravity is pull the swing downward which reduce the angle. What happen to the still acting horizontal component of tension? Now one of the most curious phenomena happen, when tension has strencth a material within its elastic limit without any resistant, an opposite force SUDDENLY come into play there to neutralize this tension. That may come from the electromagnetic attraction of the molecules in the rope. What’s more, the tension suddenly change its acting direction. Before it is the horizontal component tension acting against gravity, right after this moment, it is the same force acting with gravity.
Now we have the horizontal component of tension pulling toward the swing toward the equilibrium position, which gravity helping all alone. As the angle is reducing, vertical component of tension is continuously increasing (against the gravity) while horizontal component is continuously decrease(toward the central.) At one point when the vertical component of tension is just enough to held the swing in momentarily rest, while the reduced horizontal component of tension still driving the swing toward the central position. And during the whole process, the gravity also play the role of keeping the rope tense, which is similar to action of gravity when the swing is at the other side.
So the hidden variable is TENSION from rope, the double role of gravity and the curious nature of TENSION.
Regards
Member of the team in energyfromair.com

Last question on energy project

This discussion refer to the lecture I post here.

What happen if we applying Lawrence’s theory at the atomic level, i.e. what if we can accelerate the electron at the same way we swing the pendulum? The reverse question would be, what if we can decelerate electron by taking its energy to swing ‘pendulum’ at the atomic level? Could we stop the electron from rotating around the protons?

Hypothesis on Swing Pendulum

Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 11:01 AM

1. Tension of the thread as a spring obtaining Hook’s law.
As the pendulum swing, the thread is continually oscillating in its length.
2. It is a circular motion with angular momentum involved. And forces may play contradictory role in accelerating and decelerating the circular motion at the same time.
3. It is a mistake and misunderstanding to treat it as linear free-falling motion.
Detail discussion follow today.

Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 11:49 PM

Hypothesis:
In a pendulum, If we replace Thread with spring, and we let the spring oscillate with a mass it carries. Then we swing the pendulum.

If the frequency of oscillation of the spring is a ‘good match’ with the swinging motion of pendulum. We would thus obtain resonance. Which is another demonstration of Double Stage oscillation, and Lawrence’s invention is based on that.

A hypothesis on the Overunity Electromagnetic experiment

This discussion refer to the experiment proposed and done here. That maybe a pretty stupid idea to explain the source of extra electromagnetic energy. My thought is actually pretty simple: Suppose we display the oscillation with an oscillator, then we adjust the time-base to a greater number. The wave-like display is distorted in such a way which amplitude has increase while period is reduced when compare to original.
So my hypothesis is that the presence of strong magnetic field has distort the flow of time in the transformer, resulted an accelerated flow of time in the electrical current inside the transformer coil. Thus, relative to these who are outside the strong magnetic field, the electrical current has been amplified. The extra energy is coming from the difference of amplitude in oscillation due to the compression of time by the magnetic field by the magnet. In other words, we are using time as energy.